Entry tags:
Not racism, then.
I was listening to a podcast of a Swedish radio program about reporting. One of the participants was asked how come the news programs spent a lot of time reporting about the storm Gustav and theories on what might happen when it entered the US, and very little time reporting on an actual earthquake in China and an actual flood in India.
The response was that "It's not that we're racist or that we don't care about what happens in India or China - it's simply that what happens in the U.S. is more important."
I cannot properly convey the sound I made on hearing that.
The response was that "It's not that we're racist or that we don't care about what happens in India or China - it's simply that what happens in the U.S. is more important."
I cannot properly convey the sound I made on hearing that.
no subject
no subject
And your reason wasn't the one given in the show (Medierna) - the guy who spoke talked about the importance of something that might not even happen in the US versus the unimportance of a lot of people dying elsewhere.
It really really bugs me.
no subject
no subject
Plus, reporters find it a good excuse to visit New Orleans.
Happy birthday :)
I hope you have a nice day.
:-)
http://www.acc.umu.se/~wschedin/vacation-2008/horse-08-07-14b.jpg